Ayodhya Verdict: Belief of Hindus that Ram was born in Ayodhya ‘indisputable’, says Supreme Court.
The claim of Nirmohi Akhara is only of management. Nirmohi Akhara is not a Shabait, rules Supreme Court.
Claim of Sunnis is that since construction till destruction of Babri mosque namaz was offered there.
There was a consistent pattern of worship by Hindus in the outer courtyard.
Setting up a railing inside was done to ensure peaceful worship by both religions.
Prior to 1856-57 there was no exclusion of Hindus from inner courtyards.
The clash of 1856-57 led to setting up of a railing to allow peaceful worship.
CJI: By consistent pattern of worship, there can be no doubt that this was furtherance of their belief that this was the birthplace of lord ram below the dome of the disputed structure. No evidence to contrary to show that the possession by Muslims was exclusive.